TITLE 19. EDUCATION

PART 2. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY

CHAPTER 61. SCHOOL DISTRICTS

SUBCHAPTER CC. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING SCHOOL FACILITIES

19 TAC §61.1031

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes the repeal of §61.1031, concerning school safety requirements. The proposed repeal would relocate the requirements to proposed new 19 TAC §103.1215. The proposed repeal would relocate the requirements to proposed new 19 TAC §103.1215. The proposed new rule would include updates to implement House Bill (HB) 3 and Senate Bill (SB) 838, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, and HB 33 and HB 121, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, and clarify requirements for school safety.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: Section 61.1031 prescribes minimum school safety standards to address the safety of students and staff in Texas public schools. The proposed repeal of §61.1031 would move the requirements to proposed new §103.1215. The relocation is necessary due to a comprehensive reorganization of 19 TAC Chapter 61.

Proposed new §103.1215 would be updated to modify the definition for "exterior secured area"; clarify the applicability of the safety standards; address security reviews required under Texas Education Code, §37.1087; update alert requirements; and require door numbering site plans to be provided to emergency service districts.

FISCAL IMPACT: James Finley, deputy chief of school safety and security, has determined that for the first five years the proposal is in effect, there are no additional costs to state or local government, including school districts and open-enrollment charter schools, required to comply with the proposal

LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.

SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis, specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.

COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The proposal does not impose a cost on regulated persons, another state agency, a special district, or a local government and, therefore, is not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0045.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.

GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: TEA staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would repeal an existing regulation to relocate the requirements.

The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not create a new regulation; would not expand or limit an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.

PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Mr. Finley has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be to allow for TEA rules to be reorganized. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.

DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would have no data and reporting impact.

PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposal would not require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher.

PUBLIC COMMENTS: TEA requests public comments on the proposal, including, per Texas Government Code, §2001.024(a)(8), information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rule and any applicable data, research, or analysis, from any person required to comply with the proposed rule or any other interested person. The public comment period on the proposal begins March 27, 2026, and ends April 27, 2026. A request for a public hearing on the proposal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 14 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register on March 27, 2026. A form for submitting public comments is available on the TEA website at https://tea.texas.gov/About_TEA/Laws_and_Rules/Commissioner_Rules_(TAC)/Proposed_Commissioner_of_Education_Rules/.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The repeal is proposed under Texas Education Code (TEC), §7.061, which requires the commissioner of education to adopt and amend rules to ensure a safe and secure environment for public schools, which includes best practices for design and construction of new facilities and improving, renovating, and retrofitting existing facilities. The section requires the commissioner to review all rules by September 1 of each even-numbered year and take action as necessary to ensure school facilities for school districts and open-enrollment charter schools continue to provide a safe and secure environment; TEC, §37.1083, which establishes the Office of School Safety and Security within the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and charges TEA with monitoring the implementation and operation requirements of school district safety and security. Monitoring efforts must include technical assistance related to multihazard emergency operations plans and safety and security audits. Further, the statute establishes that any document or information collected, identified, developed, or produced related to the monitoring of district safety and security is confidential under Texas Government Code, §418.177 and §418.181, making them not subject to disclosure under Texas Government Code, Chapter 552. Subsection (k) allows the commissioner to adopt rules as necessary to implement the section; TEC, §37.115(b), which allows TEA, in coordination with the Texas School Safety Center, to adopt rules to establish a safe and supportive school program, including providing for physical and psychological safety; TEC, §37.117, which requires that each school district or open-enrollment charter school have silent alert panic technology allowing for immediate contact with district or school emergency services and emergency services agencies, law enforcement agencies, health departments, and fire departments. The statute also requires that each school district and open-enrollment charter school provide the Department of Public Safety, local law enforcement, and emergency first responders an accurate map of each district campus and school campus, in accordance with standards outlined in TEC, §37.351. Additionally, school systems must provide these emergency services personnel an opportunity to conduct a walk-through of each campus and school building using the map provided; TEC, §37.351, which requires school districts to comply with each school facilities standard, including performance standards and operational requirements, related to safety and security adopted under TEC, §7.061, or provided by other law or TEA rule. Additionally, school districts must develop and maintain documentation of the district's implementation of and compliance with school safety and security facilities standards for each district facility; and TEC, §37.355, which outlines that any document or information collected, identified, developed, or produced relating to a safety or security requirement under TEC, Chapter 37, Subchapter J, is confidential under Texas Government Code, §418.177 and §418.181, and not subject to disclosure under Texas Government Code, Chapter 552.

CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The repeal implements Texas Education Code, §§7.061, 37.1083, 37.115(b), 37.117, 37.351, and 37.355.

§61.1031. School Safety Requirements.

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 16, 2026.

TRD-202601245

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Rulemaking

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 26, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497


CHAPTER 103. HEALTH AND SAFETY

SUBCHAPTER CC. COMMISSIONERS RULES CONCERNING SAFE SCHOOLS

19 TAC §103.1215

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes new §103.1215, concerning school safety requirements. The new section would include updates to implement House Bill (HB) 3 and Senate Bill (SB) 838, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, and HB 33 and HB 121, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, and clarify requirements for school safety to ensure a safe and secure environment in Texas public schools.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: Proposed new §103.1215 would move existing language from 19 TAC §61.1031, which prescribes minimum school safety standards to address the safety of students and staff in Texas public schools. The new rule includes proposed changes to existing §61.1031.

Legislation from the 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, added and amended school safety requirements in Texas Education Code (TEC), §§7.061, 37.1083, 37.117, 37.351, and 37.355. Legislation from the 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, added TEC, §37.1087, to existing school safety requirements. Proposed new §103.1215 would implement legislation and clarify school safety requirements, as follows.

Proposed new subsection (a) would establish definitions for the proposed rule. The definition for "exterior secured area" would include new language specifying that a perimeter fence does not constitute an exterior secured area.

Proposed new subsection (b) would make the rule applicable to all school instructional facilities owned, operated, or leased by a school system, regardless of the date of construction or date of lease. No changes to the existing requirements are proposed.

Proposed new subsection (c) would require school systems to implement safety and security standards compliance requirements in all instructional facilities owned, operated, or leased by the school system. New language would be added to specify that the standards apply to facilities that are newly constructed, acquired, or substantially renovated. Language would also be added to state that security reviews required under TEC, §37.1087, should be conducted as soon as practicable after a facility is constructed, acquired, or renovated and must occur before students occupy the building. In addition, alert requirements would be modified in subsection (c)(10)(B)(iv). Finally, a new requirement would be added that beginning August 1, 2026, school systems must certify in Sentinel that security reviews have been conducted.

Proposed new subsection (d) would outline operating requirements for school systems and would include new language requiring electronic copies of exterior and interior door numbering site plans to be provided to emergency service districts.

Proposed new subsection (e) would outline that, to the extent this section conflicts with rules adopted in 19 TAC Chapter 61, School Districts, Subchapter CC, Commissioner's Rules Concerning School Facilities, including terms defined by this section or standards established by this section, the provisions of this section prevail. No changes to the existing requirements are proposed.

Proposed new subsection (f) would require school systems to comply with the standards adopted under Texas Government Code, §469.052. No changes to the existing requirements are proposed.

Proposed new subsection (g) would require school systems to adopt a 3-year records control schedule that complies with the minimum requirements established by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission schedule, record series item number 5.4.017. No changes to the existing requirements are proposed.

Proposed new subsection (h) would outline that any document or information collected, identified, developed, or produced relating to the monitoring of school district safety and security requirements is confidential under Texas Government Code, §418.177 and §418.181, and is not subject to disclosure under Texas Government Code, Chapter 552. No changes to the existing requirements are proposed.

Proposed new subsection (i) would require school systems to annually certify compliance with subsections (c) and (d) of this section as part of ongoing security audits under TEC, §37.108(b), to maintain the certification locally, and to provide documentation upon request by TEA. No changes to the existing requirements are proposed.

FISCAL IMPACT: James Finley, deputy chief of school safety and security, has determined that for the first five years the proposal is in effect, there are no additional costs to state or local government, including school districts and open-enrollment charter schools, required to comply with the proposal. Existing 19 TAC §61.1031 is being repealed and relocated to §103.1215 with modifications from the current rule. There is no additional cost anticipated for the modifications being proposed. Requirements from the 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, remain, with grant funding having been available to ensure compliance with existing requirements. Additionally, HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, increased school safety allotment funding by at or around $500 million.

LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.

SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis, specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.

COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The requirements of this proposal would impose costs on school districts and open-enrollment charter schools. However, the rule is not subject to the limitations of Texas Government Code, §2001.0045. The school safety requirements are necessary to protect the safety and welfare of residents of this state. Additionally, TEC, §7.061, explicitly requires the commissioner to review at least every two years the rules for a safe and secure environment and update those rules when necessary. Consequently, any costs imposed by the update of the rules are necessary to implement the legislation passed by the legislature. Additionally, grants provided to school districts help defray or completely offset the estimated costs. Safety and Facilities Enhancement (SAFE) Grants total $1.1 billion and School Safety Standards Formula Grants total $400 million. In accordance with HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, approximately $500 million was added to the school safety allotment (TEC, §48.160).

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.

GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: TEA staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would create a new regulation to relocate existing requirements. The proposed new rule would detail the school safety requirements outlined in TEC, §§7.061, 37.1083, 37.1087, 37.117, 37.118, 37.351, 37.355.

The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not expand, limit, or repeal an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.

PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Mr. Finley has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be to ensure that school districts and open-enrollment charter schools implement minimum school safety standards to address the safety of students and staff in Texas public schools. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.

DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would have no data and reporting impact.

PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposal would not require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher.

PUBLIC COMMENTS: TEA requests public comments on the proposal, including, per Texas Government Code, §2001.024(a)(8), information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rule and any applicable data, research, or analysis, from any person required to comply with the proposed rule or any other interested person. The public comment period on the proposal begins March 27, 2026, and ends April 27, 2026. A request for a public hearing on the proposal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 14 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register on March 27, 2026. A form for submitting public comments is available on the TEA website at https://tea.texas.gov/About_TEA/Laws_and_Rules/Commissioner_Rules_(TAC)/Proposed_Commissioner_of_Education_Rules/.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The new section is proposed under Texas Education Code (TEC), §7.061, as amended by House Bill (HB) 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which requires the commissioner of education to adopt and amend rules to ensure a safe and secure environment for public schools, which includes best practices for design and construction of new facilities and improving, renovating, and retrofitting existing facilities. The section requires the commissioner to review all rules by September 1 of each even-numbered year and take action as necessary to ensure school facilities for school districts and open-enrollment charter schools continue to provide a safe and secure environment; TEC, §37.1083, as added by HB 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, and amended by HB 121, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes the Office of School Safety and Security within the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and charges TEA with monitoring the implementation and operation requirements of school district safety and security. Monitoring efforts must include technical assistance related to multihazard emergency operations plans, safety and security audits, and security reviews. Further, the statute establishes that any document or information collected, identified, developed, or produced related to the monitoring of district safety and security is confidential under Texas Government Code, §418.177 and §418.181, making them not subject to disclosure under Texas Government Code, Chapter 552. Subsection (k) allows the commissioner to adopt rules as necessary to implement the section; TEC, §37.1087, as added by HB 33, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which requires a school district that constructs, acquires, renovates, or improves a district facility to conduct a security review to determine whether the facility meets school safety and security requirements; TEC, §37.115(b), which allows TEA, in coordination with the Texas School Safety Center, to adopt rules to establish a safe and supportive school program, including providing for physical and psychological safety; TEC, §37.117, as added by Senate Bill (SB) 838 and HB 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which requires that each school district and open-enrollment charter school provide the Department of Public Safety, local law enforcement, emergency service districts, and emergency first responders an accurate map of each district campus and school campus, in accordance with standards outlined in TEC, §37.351. Additionally, school systems must provide these emergency services personnel an opportunity to conduct a walk-through of each campus and school building using the map provided; TEC, §37.118, as added by SB 838 and HB 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which requires that each school district or open-enrollment charter school have silent alert panic technology allowing for immediate contact with district or school emergency services and emergency services agencies, law enforcement agencies, health departments, and fire departments; TEC, §37.351, as added by HB 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which requires school districts to comply with each school facilities standard, including performance standards and operational requirements, related to safety and security adopted under TEC, §7.061, or provided by other law or TEA rule. Additionally, school districts must develop and maintain documentation of the district's implementation of and compliance with school safety and security facilities standards for each district facility; and TEC, §37.355, as added by HB 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which outlines that any document or information collected, identified, developed, or produced relating to a safety or security requirement under TEC, Chapter 37, Subchapter J, is confidential under Texas Government Code, §418.177 and §418.181, and not subject to disclosure under Texas Government Code, Chapter 552.

CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The new section implements Texas Education Code, §7.061, as amended by House Bill (HB) 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; §37.1083, as added by HB 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, and amended by HB 121, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025; §37.1087, as added by HB 33, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025; §37.115(b); §37.117, as added by Senate Bill (SB) 838 and HB 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; §37.118, as added by SB 838 and HB 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; and §37.351 and §37.355, as added by HB 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023.

§103.1215. School Safety Requirements.

(a) Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this section, shall have the following meanings.

(1) Actively monitored--supervised by an adult who can visibly review visitors prior to entrance, who can take immediate action to close and/or lock the door, and whose duties allow for sufficient attention to monitoring.

(2) Exterior secured area--

(A) This term describes an area fully enclosed by a fence and/or wall that:

(i) is utilized when keeping doors closed, locked, and latched is not operationally possible;

(ii) if enclosed by a fence or wall, utilizes a fence or wall at least 6 feet high with design features that prevent it from being easily scalable, such as stone, wrought iron, chain link with slats or wind screen, or chain link topped with an anti-scaling device, or utilizes a fence or wall at least 8 feet high;

(iii) is well maintained; and

(iv) if gated, features locked gates with emergency egress hardware and has features to prevent opening from the exterior without a key or combination mechanism.

(B) A perimeter fence does not constitute an exterior secured area.

(3) Instructional facility--this term has the meaning assigned in Texas Education Code (TEC), §46.001, and includes any real property, an improvement to real property, or a necessary fixture of an improvement to real property that is used predominantly for teaching curriculum under TEC, §28.002. For purposes of this section, an instructional facility does not include real property, improvements to real property, or necessary fixtures of an improvement to real property that are part of a federal, state, or private correctional facility or facility of an institution of higher education, medical provider, or other provider of professional or social services over which a school system has no control.

(4) Modular, portable building--

(A) an industrialized building as defined by Texas Occupations Code (TOC), §1202.002 and §1202.003;

(B) any relocatable educational facility as defined by TOC, §1202.004, regardless of the location of construction of the facility; or

(C) any other manufactured or site-built building that is capable of being relocated and is used as a school facility.

(5) Primary entrance--

(A) the main entrance to an instructional facility that is closest to or directly connected to the reception area; or

(B) any exterior door the school system intends to allow visitors to use to enter the facility during school hours either through policy or practice.

(6) School system--a public independent school district or public open-enrollment charter school.

(7) Secure vestibule--a secured space with two or more sets of doors and an office sign-in area where all but the exterior doors shall:

(A) remain closed, latched, and locked;

(B) comply with subsection (c)(3)(B) of this section; and

(C) only unlock once the visitor has been visually verified.

(b) The provisions of this section apply to all school instructional facilities owned, operated, or leased by a school system, regardless of the date of construction or date of lease. The provisions of this section ensure that all school system instructional facilities have access points that are:

(1) secured by design;

(2) maintained to operate as intended; and

(3) appropriately monitored.

(c) A school system shall implement the following safety and security standards compliance requirements to all instructional facilities owned, operated, or leased by the school system, to include facilities newly constructed, acquired, or substantially renovated. In implementing the requirements of this section, school systems shall comply with the provisions of §61.1040(j) of this title (relating to School Facilities Standards for Construction on or after November 1, 2021) and the security review requirements outlined in TEC, §37.1087. Security reviews should be conducted as soon as practicable after a facility is constructed, acquired, or renovated and must occur before students occupy the building. Beginning August 1, 2026, school systems must certify in Sentinel that security reviews have been conducted, in accordance with §103.1213 of this title (relating to Required Reporting through Sentinel).

(1) All instructional facilities, including modular, portable buildings, must include the addition of graphically represented alpha-numerical characters on both the interior and exterior of each exterior door location. The characters may be installed on the door, or on at least one door at locations where more than one door leads from the exterior to the same room inside the facility, or on the wall immediately adjacent to or above the door location. Characters shall comply with the International Fire Code, §505, which requires numbers to be a minimum of four inches in height. The primary entrance of an instructional facility shall always be the first in the entire sequence and is the only door location that does not require numbering. The numbering sequence shall be clockwise and may be sequenced for the entire campus or for each facility individually. The door-numbering process must comply with all accessibility requirements related to signage.

(2) Unless a secure vestibule is present, a primary entrance shall:

(A) meet all standards for exterior doors;

(B) include a means to allow an individual located within the building to visually identify an individual seeking to enter the primary entrance when the entrance is closed and locked, including, but not limited to, windows, camera systems, and/or intercoms;

(C) feature a physical barrier that prevents unassisted access to the facility by a visitor; and

(D) feature a location for a visitor check-in and check-out process.

(3) All exterior doors shall:

(A) be set to a closed, latched, and locked status, except that:

(i) a door may be unlocked if it is actively monitored or within an exterior secured area; and

(ii) for the purposes of ventilation, a school system may designate in writing as part of its multi-hazard emergency operations plan under TEC, §37.108, specific exterior doors that are allowed to remain open for specified periods of time if explicitly authorized by the school safety and security committee established by TEC, §37.109, when a quorum of members are present, and only if it is actively monitored or within an exterior secured area;

(B) be constructed, both for the door and door frame and their components, of materials and in a manner that make them resistant to entry by intruders. Unless inside an exterior secured area, doors constructed of glass or containing glass shall be constructed or modified such that the glass cannot be easily broken and allow an intruder to open or otherwise enter through the door (for example, using forced entry-resistant film);

(C) include:

(i) a mechanism that fully closes and engages locking hardware automatically after entry or egress without manual intervention, regardless of air pressure within or outside of the facility; and

(ii) a mechanism that allows the door to be opened from the inside when locked to allow for emergency egress while remaining locked; and

(D) if keyed for re-entry, be capable of being unlocked with a single (or a small set of) master key(s), whether physical key, punch code, or key-fob or similar electronic device.

(4) Except when inside an exterior secured area, classrooms with exterior entry doors shall include a means to allow an individual located in the classroom to visually identify an individual seeking to enter the classroom when the door is closed and locked, including, but not limited to, windows, camera systems, and/or intercoms.

(5) Except when inside an exterior secured area, all windows that are adjacent to an exterior door and that are of a size and position that, if broken, would easily permit an individual to reach in and open the door from the inside shall be constructed or modified such that the glass cannot be easily broken.

(6) Except when inside an exterior secured area, all ground-level windows near exterior doors that are of a size and position that permits entry from the exterior if broken shall be constructed or modified such that the glass cannot be easily broken and allow an intruder to enter through the window frame (for example, using forced entry-resistant film).

(7) If designed to be opened, all ground-level windows shall have functional locking mechanisms that allow for the windows to be locked from the inside and, if large enough for an individual to enter when opened or if adjacent to a door, be closed and locked when staff are not present.

(8) Roof access doors shall remain closed, latched, and locked when not actively in use.

(9) All facilities must:

(A) include one or more distinctive, exterior secure master key box(es) designed to permit emergency access to both law enforcement agencies and emergency responder agencies from the exterior (for example, a Knox box) at a location designated by the local authorities with applicable jurisdiction; or

(B) provide all local law enforcement electronic or physical master key access to the building(s).

(10) A communications infrastructure shall be implemented that must:

(A) ensure equipment is in place such that law enforcement and emergency responder two-way radios can function within most portions of the building(s); and

(B) include a panic alert button, duress, or equivalent alarm system, via standalone hardware, software, or integrated into other telecommunications devices or online applications, that includes the following functionality.

(i) An alert must be capable of being triggered by campus staff, including temporary or substitute staff, from an integrated or enabled device.

(ii) An alert must be triggered automatically in the event a district employee makes a 9-1-1 call using the hardware or integrated telecommunications devices described in this subparagraph from any location within the school system.

(iii) With any alert generated, the location of where the alert originated shall be included.

(iv) The alert must allow for immediate contact with the 9-1-1 dispatch center, district or school emergency services, law enforcement agencies, health departments, and fire departments. Alerts must notify designated administrators and simultaneously notify affected staff of the emergency.

(v) For any exterior doors that feature electronic locking mechanisms that allow for remote locking, the alert system will trigger those doors to automatically lock.

(11) School systems shall ensure compliance with state and federal Kari's Laws and federal RAY BAUM's Act and corresponding rules and regulations pertaining to 9-1-1 service for school telephone systems, including a multi-line telephone system.

(d) Certain operating requirements. A school system shall implement the following.

(1) Access control. The board of trustees or the governing board shall adopt a policy requiring the following continued auditing of building access:

(A) conduct at least weekly inspections during school hours of all exterior doors of all instructional facilities to certify that all doors are set to a closed, latched, and locked status and cannot be opened from the outside without a key as required in subsection (c)(3)(A) of this section;

(B) report the findings of weekly inspections required by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph to the school system's safety and security committee as required by TEC, §37.109, and ensure the results are kept for review as part of the safety and security audit as required by TEC, §37.108;

(C) report the findings of weekly inspections required by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph to the principal or leader of the instructional facility to ensure awareness of any deficiencies identified and who must take action to reduce the likelihood of similar deficiencies in the future; and

(D) include a provision in the school system's applicable policy stating that nothing in a school system's access control procedures will be interpreted as discouraging parents, once properly verified as authorized campus visitors, from visiting campuses they are authorized to visit.

(2) Exterior and interior door numbering site plan.

(A) A school system must develop and maintain an accurate site layout and exterior and interior door designation document for each instructional facility school system-wide that identifies all exterior and interior doors in the instructional facility and depicts all exterior doors on a floor plan with an alpha-numeric designation, in accordance with the door numbering specifications established in subsection (c)(1) of this section.

(B) Copies of exterior and interior door numbering site plans shall be readily available in each campus main office.

(C) Electronic copies of exterior and interior door numbering site plans shall be provided to the local 9-1-1 administrative entity, the Department of Public Safety, emergency service districts, local law enforcement agencies, and emergency first responders in accordance with TEC, §37.117. These entities shall be afforded an opportunity to conduct a walk-through of facilities utilizing the site plans provided.

(D) The site layout and exterior and interior door designation document shall be oriented in a manner that depicts true north.

(3) Maintenance.

(A) A school system shall perform at least twice-yearly maintenance checks to ensure the facility components required in subsection (c) of this section function as required. At a minimum, maintenance checks shall ensure the following:

(i) instructional facility exterior doors function properly, including meeting the requirements in subsection (c)(3)(A) and (C) of this section;

(ii) the locking mechanism for any ground-level windows that can be opened function properly;

(iii) any perimeter barriers and related gates function properly;

(iv) all panic alert or similar emergency notification systems in classrooms and campus central offices function properly, which includes a notification successfully broadcast to all campus staff and to law enforcement and emergency responders;

(v) all school telephone systems and communications infrastructure provide accurate location information when a 9-1-1 call is made in accordance with state and federal laws and rules and when an alert is triggered in accordance with this section;

(vi) all exterior master key boxes function properly and the keys they contain function properly;

(vii) law enforcement and emergency responder two-way radios operate effectively within each instructional facility; and

(viii) two-way radios used by school system peace officers, school resource officers, or school marshals properly communicate with local law enforcement and emergency response services.

(B) A school system shall ensure procedures are in place to require that staff who become aware of a facility component functionality deficiency that would be identified during the twice-yearly maintenance review described by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph immediately report the deficiency to the school system's administration, regardless of the status of the twice-yearly maintenance review.

(C) A school system shall promptly remedy any deficiencies discovered during maintenance checks required by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph or reports made under subparagraph (B) of this paragraph.

(e) To the extent that any provisions of this section conflict with rules adopted in Chapter 61, Subchapter CC, of this title (relating to Commissioner's Rules Concerning School Facilities), including terms defined by this section or standards established by this section, the provisions of this section prevail.

(f) In implementing the requirements of this section, school systems shall comply with the standards adopted under Texas Government Code, §469.052.

(g) In implementing the requirements of this section, school systems must adopt a 3-year records control schedule that complies with the minimum requirements established by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission schedule, record series item number 5.4.017, as referenced in Texas Government Code, §441.169, and Texas Local Government Code, §203.041.

(h) Any document or information collected, identified, developed, or produced relating to the monitoring of school district safety and security requirements is confidential under Texas Government Code, §418.177 and §418.181, and is not subject to disclosure under Texas Government Code, Chapter 552.

(i) Certification.

(1) A school system must annually certify compliance with subsections (c) and (d) of this section as part of ongoing security audits under TEC, §37.108(b); maintain the certification locally; and provide documentation upon request by TEA. Non-compliance with subsections (c) and (d) of this section and all information received upon completion of a district vulnerability assessment under TEC, §37.1083, shall be reported to the school system's safety and security committee, the school system's board, and TEA, as applicable.

(2) TEA may modify rule requirements or grant provisional certification for individual site needs as determined by TEA.

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 16, 2026.

TRD-202601246

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Rulemaking

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 26, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497


19 TAC §103.1219

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes new §103.1219, concerning assignment of a conservator for noncompliance with school safety and security requirements. The proposed new rule would ensure school system compliance with safety requirements, as required by Texas Education Code (TEC), §37.1085, as added by House Bill (HB) 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: Proposed new §103.1219 would outline the circumstances under which a conservator can be assigned for school systems that fail to comply with safety and security monitoring or to timely address issues raised by TEA, in accordance with TEC, §37.1085.

Proposed new §103.1219 would outline the circumstances where the commissioner of education can appoint a conservator related to school safety and security monitoring, the powers and duties an assigned conservator may exercise, and exceptions to conservator appointments, as related to school safety and security.

FISCAL IMPACT: James Finley, deputy chief of school safety and security, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposal is in effect, there are no additional costs to state or local government, including school districts and open-enrollment charter schools, required to comply with the proposal.

LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.

SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis, specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.

COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The proposal does not impose a cost on regulated persons, another state agency, a special district, or a local government and, therefore, is not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0045.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.

GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: TEA staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would create a new regulation by allowing the commissioner to appoint a conservator for noncompliance with school safety and security requirements.

The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not expand, limit, or repeal an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.

PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Mr. Finley has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be school system compliance with established safety and security requirements and TEA monitoring, resulting in safer learning environments for students, staff, and visitors. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.

DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would have no data and reporting impact.

PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposal would not require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher.

PUBLIC COMMENTS: TEA requests public comments on the proposal, including, per Texas Government Code, §2001.024(a)(8), information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rule and any applicable data, research, or analysis, from any person required to comply with the proposed rule or any other interested person. The public comment period on the proposal begins March 27, 2026, and ends April 27, 2026. A request for a public hearing on the proposal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 14 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register on March 27, 2026. A form for submitting public comments is available on the TEA website at https://tea.texas.gov/About_TEA/Laws_and_Rules/Commissioner_Rules_(TAC)/Proposed_Commissioner_of_Education_Rules/.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The new section is proposed under TEC, §37.1085, as added by HB 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which grants the commissioner of education the authority to assign a conservator under TEC, Chapter 39A, if a school district fails to submit to any required monitoring, assessment, or audit; to comply with applicable safety and security requirements; or to timely address issues raised by the Texas Education Agency's monitoring, assessment, or audit.

CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The new section implements TEC, §37.1085, as added by HB 3, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023.

§103.1219. Assignment of a Conservator for Noncompliance with School Safety and Security Requirements.

(a) The commissioner of education may assign a conservator whenever such action is required, as determined by this section.

(b) The commissioner may appoint a conservator under Texas Education Code (TEC), Chapter 39A, when a school system fails to:

(1) submit to any required monitoring, assessment, or audit under TEC, §37.1083 or §37.1084;

(2) comply with applicable safety and security requirements; or

(3) address within 1 year issues raised by the Texas Education Agency's monitoring, assessment, or audit of the school system.

(c) A conservator assigned to a school system under this section may exercise the powers and duties of a conservator under TEC, §39A.003, only to correct a failure identified under subsection (b) of this section.

(d) This section does not apply to a school systems' failure to comply with TEC, §37.0814, or a good cause exception claimed under that section.

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 16, 2026.

TRD-202601247

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Rulemaking

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 26, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497


CHAPTER 109. BUDGETING, ACCOUNTING, AND AUDITING

SUBCHAPTER AA. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

19 TAC §109.1001

(Editor's note: In accordance with Texas Government Code, §2002.014, which permits the omission of material which is "cumbersome, expensive, or otherwise inexpedient," the figures in 19 TAC §109.1001 are not included in the print version of the Texas Register. The figures are available in the on-line version of the March 27, 2026, issue of the Texas Register.)

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes an amendment to §109.1001, concerning financial accountability ratings. The proposed amendment would update financial accountability rating information and rating worksheets for school districts and open-enrollment charter schools.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: Section 109.1001 includes the financial accountability rating system and rating worksheets that explain the indicators that TEA will analyze to assign financial accountability ratings for school districts and open-enrollment charter schools. The rule also specifies the minimum financial accountability rating information that a school district or an open-enrollment charter school is to report to parents and taxpayers in the district.

The proposed amendment would remove outdated rating worksheets and clarify the financial accountability rating indicators terminology used to determine each school district's and charter school's rating for the 2025-2026 rating year by revising the rating worksheets in re-lettered §109.1001(e)(1) and (f)(1) and by adding a rating worksheet in §109.1001(g)(1). The proposed amendment would also include calculations and terminology clarifications for the 2026-2027 rating year and subsequent years by adding rating worksheets in new §109.1001(e)(2) and (f)(2) and §109.1001(g)(2).

Proposed new subsection (e)(2) would be added, including new Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(e)(2), that would clarify terminology and calculations for School Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas (FIRST) indicators for years subsequent to the 2025-2026 rating year.

Proposed new subsection (f)(2) would be added, including new Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(f)(2), that would clarify terminology and calculations for Charter FIRST indicators for years subsequent to the 2025-2026 rating year.

Proposed new subsection (g)(1) would be added, including new Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(g)(1), that would clarify terminology and calculations for Charter FIRST indicators for institution of higher education (IHE) charter schools for the 2025-2026 rating year.

Proposed new subsection (g)(2) would be added, including new Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(g)(2), that would clarify terminology and calculations for Charter FIRST indicators for IHE charter schools for years subsequent to the 2025-2026 rating year.

Proposed new subsection (g)(3) would be added to affirm calculations and scoring methods for charter schools operated by a public IHE adopted for prior rating years would remain in effect for purposes with respect to those rating years.

The worksheets dated July 2026 differ from the worksheets dated June 2024 as follows.

Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(e)(1)

The due date for the fiscal year 2025 annual financial report (AFR) and financial data to TEA for indicator 1 would be revised for the 2025-2026 rating year primarily because the 2025 Compliance Supplement was released late in 2025 by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

The calculation for indicator 5 would be revised to include premiums on capital appreciation bonds with accreted interest on capital appreciation bonds to increase the adjusted net position.

The average daily attendance (ADA) ranges would be clarified for indicators 13 and 15.

The terminology for indicator 15 would be clarified to align with data used in the calculation for the indicator.

Calculations for indicators 6, 7, 9, and 13 would be adjusted to subtract recapture expenditures from total expenditures for school districts with local revenue in excess of entitlement, and indicator 9 would be adjusted to reduce the revenue that was recaptured from these districts. For school districts that have a fiscal year end of June 30, calculations for indicators 7, 8, and 11 would be adjusted to remove recapture amounts from cash and current liabilities, as applicable.

Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(f)(1)

The due date for the fiscal year 2025 AFR and financial data to the agency for indicator 1 would be revised for the 2025-2026 rating year primarily because the 2025 Compliance Supplement was released late in 2025 by the OMB.

The calculation for indicator 12 would be revised to reflect changes in accounting principles.

For indicator 14, ADA ranges would be clarified, and terminology would be clarified to exclude object code 6144 from the calculation.

FISCAL IMPACT: Amy Copeland, associate commissioner for school finance and chief school finance officer, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposal is in effect, there are no additional costs to state or local government, including school districts and open-enrollment charter schools, required to comply with the proposal.

LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.

SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis, specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.

COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The proposal does not impose a cost on regulated persons, another state agency, a special district, or a local government and, therefore, is not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0045.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.

GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: TEA staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would expand an existing regulation by clarifying terminology used to define FIRST indicators.

The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not create a new regulation; would not limit or repeal an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.

PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Ms. Copeland has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be ensuring that the provisions of the financial accountability rating system align to make the indicators uniform for all school districts and charter schools and would provide a fair and equitable rating system for all school districts and charter schools. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.

DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would have no data and reporting impact.

PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposal would not require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher.

PUBLIC COMMENTS: TEA requests public comments on the proposal, including, per Texas Government Code, §2001.024(a)(8), information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rule and any applicable data, research, or analysis, from any person required to comply with the proposed rule or any other interested person. The public comment period on the proposal begins March 27, 2026, and ends April 27, 2026. A request for a public hearing on the proposal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 14 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register on March 27, 2026. A form for submitting public comments is available on the TEA website at https://tea.texas.gov/About_TEA/Laws_and_Rules/Commissioner_Rules_(TAC)/Proposed_Commissioner_of_Education_Rules/.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The amendment is proposed under TEC, §12.104(b)(3)(M), which subjects open-enrollment charter schools to the prohibitions, restrictions, or requirements relating to public school accountability and special investigations under TEC, Chapter 39, Subchapters A, B, C, D, F, G, and J, and TEC, Chapter 39A; TEC, §39.082, which requires the commissioner to develop and implement a financial accountability rating system for public schools and establishes certain minimum requirements for the system, including an appeals process; TEC, §39.083, which requires the commissioner to include in the financial accountability system procedures for public schools to report and receive public comment on an annual financial management report; TEC, §39.085, which requires the commissioner to adopt rules to implement TEC, Chapter 39, Subchapter D, which addresses financial accountability for public schools; and TEC, §39.151, as amended by House Bill (HB) 8, 89th Texas Legislature, 2nd Called Session, 2025, which requires the commissioner to provide a process by which a school district or an open-enrollment charter school can challenge an agency decision related to academic or financial accountability under TEC, Chapter 39, including a determination of consecutive school years of unacceptable performance ratings. This process must include a committee to make recommendations to the commissioner. These provisions collectively authorize and require the commissioner to adopt the financial accountability system rules, which implement each requirement of statute applicable to school districts and open-enrollment charter schools.

CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The amendment implements TEC, §§12.104(b)(3)(M); 39.082; 39.083; 39.085; and 39.151, as amended by HB 8, 89th Texas Legislature, 2nd Called Session, 2025.

§109.1001. Financial Accountability Ratings.

(a) The following words and terms, when used in this section, have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Annual Financial Report (AFR)--The audited annual report required by [the] Texas Education Code (TEC), §44.008, that is due to the Texas Education Agency (TEA) by no later than 150 days after the close of a school district's or an open-enrollment charter school's fiscal year.

(2) Ceiling indicator--An upper limit (the maximum score) at which a score from a standard limit of a specific indicator will result regardless of overall points.

(3) Debt--An amount of money owed to a person, bank, company, or other organization.

(4) Electronic submission--The TEA electronic data feed format required for use by school districts, open-enrollment charter schools, and regional education service centers (ESCs).

(5) Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas (FIRST)--The financial accountability rating system administered by [the] TEA in accordance with [the] TEC, §39.082 and §39.085. The system provides additional transparency to public education finance and meaningful financial oversight and improvement for school districts (School FIRST) and open-enrollment charter schools and charter schools operated by a public institution of higher education under TEC, Chapter 12, Subchapters D and E (Charter FIRST).

(6) Fiscal year--The fiscal year of a school district or an open-enrollment charter school, which begins on July 1 or September 1 of each year, as determined by the board of trustees of the district or the governing body of the charter holder in accordance with [the] TEC, §44.0011.

(7) Foundation School Program (FSP)--The program established under [the] TEC, Chapters 41, 42, and 46, or any successor program of state-appropriated funding for school districts in this state.

(8) Open-enrollment charter school--A charter school authorized by the commissioner of education under TEC, Chapter 12, Subchapter D.

(9) Public institution of higher education (IHE)--A public college or university eligible to operate a school district; an open-enrollment charter school; or a TEC, Chapter 12, Subchapter E, charter school authorized by the commissioner.

(10) Summary of Finances (SOF) report--The document of record for FSP allocations. An SOF report is produced for each school district and open-enrollment charter school by the TEA division responsible for state funding that describes the school district's or open-enrollment charter school's funding elements and FSP state aid.

(11) Texas Student Data System Public Education Information Management System (TSDS PEIMS)--The system that school districts and open-enrollment charter schools use to load, validate, and submit their data to [the] TEA.

(12) Warrant hold--The process by which state payments issued to payees indebted to the state, or payees with a tax delinquency, are held by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts until the debt is satisfied in accordance with [the] Texas Government Code, §403.055.

(b) [The] TEA will assign a financial accountability rating to each school district, open-enrollment charter school, and charter school operated by a public IHE under TEC, Chapter 12, Subchapters D and E, as required by [the] TEC, §39.082.

(c) The commissioner will evaluate the rating system every three years as required by [the] TEC, §39.082, and may modify the system in order to improve the effectiveness of the rating system. If the rating system has been modified, [the] TEA will communicate changes to ratings criteria and their effective dates to school districts, open-enrollment charter schools, and charter schools operated by public IHEs.

(d) [The] TEA will use the following sources of data in calculating the financial accountability indicators for school districts, open-enrollment charter schools, and charter schools operated by public IHEs.

(1) AFR. For each school district, open-enrollment charter school, and charter school operated by a public IHE, [the] TEA will use audited financial data in the district's or charter's AFR. The AFR, submitted as an electronic submission through the TEA website, must include data required in the Financial Accountability System Resource Guide (FASRG) adopted under §109.41 of this title (relating to Financial Accountability System Resource Guide).

(2) TSDS PEIMS. [The] TEA will use TSDS PEIMS data submitted by the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE in the calculation of the financial accountability indicators.

(3) Warrant holds. [The] TEA will use warrant holds as reported by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts in the calculation of the financial accountability indicators.

(4) FSP. [The] TEA will use the average daily attendance (ADA) information used for FSP funding purposes for the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE in the calculation of the financial accountability indicators.

(e) [The] TEA will base the financial accountability rating of a school district on its overall performance on the financial measurements, ratios, and other indicators established by the commissioner, as shown in the figures provided in this subsection. Financial accountability ratings for a rating year are based on the data from the immediate prior fiscal year.

[(1) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2014-2015 are based on fiscal year 2014 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "School FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated August 2015 for rating year 2014-2015."]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(e)(1)]

[(2) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2015-2016 are based on fiscal year 2015 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "School FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated August 2015 for rating year 2015-2016."]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(e)(2)]

[(3) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2016-2017 are based on fiscal year 2016 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "School FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated December 2016 for rating year 2016-2017."]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(e)(3)]

[(4) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years 2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020 are based on financial data from fiscal years 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively, and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "School FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated April 2020 for rating years 2017-2018 through 2019-2020." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years 2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(e)(4)]

[(5) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2020-2021 are based on fiscal year 2020 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "School FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated October 2021 for rating year 2020-2021." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years after 2020-2021 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(e)(5)]

[(6) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2021-2022 are based on fiscal year 2021 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "School FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated October 2021 for rating year 2021-2022." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years after 2021-2022 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(e)(6)]

[(7) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2022-2023 are based on fiscal year 2022 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "School FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated June 2023 for rating year 2022-2023." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years after 2022-2023 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(e)(7)]

[(8) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2023-2024 are based on fiscal year 2023 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "School FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated June 2024 for Rating Years 2023-2024+." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years after 2023-2024 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(e)(8)]

(1) [(9)] The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2025-2026 are based on fiscal year 2025 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "School FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated July 2026 [June 2024] for Rating Years 2025-2026+." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years after 2025-2026 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.

Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(e)(1) (.pdf)

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(e)(9)]

(2) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2026-2027 are based on fiscal year 2026 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "School FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated July 2026 for Rating Years 2026-2027+." The financial accountability indicators for rating years after 2026-2027 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.

Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(e)(2) (.pdf)

(3) [(10)] The specific calculations and scoring methods used in the financial accountability rating worksheets for school districts adopted for prior rating years [prior to 2014-2015] remain in effect for all purposes with respect to those rating years.

(f) [The] TEA will base the financial accountability rating of an open-enrollment charter school on its overall performance on the financial measurements, ratios, and other indicators established by the commissioner, as shown in the figures provided in this subsection. Financial accountability ratings for a rating year are based on the data from the immediate prior fiscal year.

[(1) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2014-2015 are based on fiscal year 2014 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated August 2015 for rating year 2014-2015."]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(f)(1)]

[(2) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2015-2016 are based on fiscal year 2015 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated August 2015 for rating year 2015-2016."]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(f)(2)]

[(3) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2016-2017 are based on fiscal year 2016 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated August 2015 for rating year 2016-2017."]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(f)(3)]

[(4) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years 2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020 are based on financial data from fiscal years 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively, and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated April 2020 for rating year 2017-2018." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years 2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(f)(4)]

[(5) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2020-2021 are based on fiscal year 2020 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated October 2021 for rating year 2020-2021." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years after 2020-2021 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(f)(5)]

[(6) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2021-2022 are based on fiscal year 2021 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated October 2021 for rating year 2021-2022." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years after 2021-2022 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(f)(6)]

[(7) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2022-2023 are based on fiscal year 2022 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated June 2023 for rating year 2022-2023." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years after 2022-2023 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(f)(7)]

[(8) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2023-2024 are based on fiscal year 2022 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated June 2024 for Rating Years 2023-2024+." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years after 2023-2024 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(f)(8)]

(1) [(9)] The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2025-2026 are based on fiscal year 2025 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated July 2026 [June 2024] for Rating Years 2025-2026+." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years after 2025-2026 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.

Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(f)(1) (.pdf)

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(f)(9)]

(2) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2026-2027 are based on fiscal year 2026 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated July 2026 for Rating Years 2026-2027+." The financial accountability indicators for rating years after 2026-2027 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.

Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(f)(2) (.pdf)

(3) [(10)] The specific calculations and scoring methods used in the financial accountability rating worksheets for open-enrollment charter schools adopted for prior rating years [prior to 2014-2015] remain in effect for all purposes with respect to those rating years.

(g) [The] TEA will base the financial accountability rating of a charter school operated by a public IHE on its overall performance on the financial measurements, ratios, and other indicators established by the commissioner, as shown in the figures provided in this subsection. Financial accountability ratings for a rating year are based on the data from the immediate prior fiscal year.

(1) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2025-2026 are based on fiscal year 2025 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "IHE Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated July 2026 for rating year 2025-2026." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years after 2025-2026 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.

Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(g)(1) (.pdf)

(2) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2026-2027 are based on fiscal year 2026 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "IHE Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated July 2026 for rating year 2026-2027." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years after 2026-2027 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.

Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(g)(2) (.pdf)

(3) The specific calculations and scoring methods used in the financial accountability rating worksheets for charter schools operated by a public IHE adopted for prior rating years remain in effect for all purposes with respect to those rating years.

[(1) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2016-2017 are based on fiscal year 2016 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "IHE Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated June 2019 for rating years 2016-2017 through 2019-2020." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years 2016-2017 through 2019-2020 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(g)(1)]

[(2) The financial accountability rating indicators for rating year 2020-2021 are based on fiscal year 2020 financial data and are provided in the figure in this paragraph entitled "IHE Charter FIRST - Rating Worksheet Dated June 2019 for rating year 2020-2021." The financial accountability rating indicators for rating years after 2020-2021 will use the same calculations and scoring method provided in the figure in this paragraph.]

[Figure: 19 TAC §109.1001(g)(2)]

(h) The types of financial accountability ratings that school districts or open-enrollment charter schools may receive for the rating year 2014-2015 are as follows.

(1) P for pass. This rating applies only to the financial accountability rating for rating year 2014-2015 based on fiscal year 2014 financial data. In accordance with the procedures established in this section, a school district or an open-enrollment charter school will receive a P rating if it scores within the applicable range established by the commissioner for a P rating.

(2) F for substandard achievement. This rating applies to the financial accountability rating for rating year 2014-2015 based on fiscal year 2014 financial data. In accordance with the procedures established in this section, a school district or an open-enrollment charter school will receive an F rating if it scores within the applicable range established by the commissioner for an F rating.

(i) The types of financial accountability ratings that school districts or open-enrollment charter schools may receive for the rating year 2015-2016 and all subsequent rating years are as follows.

(1) A for superior achievement. Beginning with the financial accountability rating for rating year 2015-2016 and all subsequent rating years, in accordance with the procedures established in this section, a school district or an open-enrollment charter school will receive an A rating if it scores within the applicable range established by the commissioner for an A rating.

(2) B for above standard achievement. Beginning with the financial accountability rating for rating year 2015-2016 and all subsequent rating years, in accordance with the procedures established in this section, a school district or an open-enrollment charter school will receive a B rating if it scores within the applicable range established by the commissioner for a B rating.

(3) C for standard achievement. Beginning with the financial accountability rating for rating year 2015-2016 and all subsequent rating years, in accordance with the procedures established in this section, a school district or an open-enrollment charter school will receive a C rating if it scores within the applicable range established by the commissioner for a C rating.

(4) F for substandard achievement. Beginning with the financial accountability rating for rating year 2015-2016 and all subsequent rating years, in accordance with the procedures established in this section, a school district or an open-enrollment charter school will receive an F rating if it scores within the applicable range established by the commissioner for an F rating.

(5) No Rating. Beginning with the financial accountability rating for rating year 2016-2017 and all subsequent rating years, in accordance with the procedures established in this section, a school district receiving territory due to an annexation order by the commissioner under [the] TEC, §13.054, or consolidation under [the] TEC, Chapter 49, Subchapter H, will not receive a rating for two consecutive rating years beginning with the rating year that is based on financial data from the fiscal year in which the order of annexation becomes effective. After the second rating year, the receiving district will be subject to the financial accountability rating system established by the commissioner in this section.

(j) The types of financial accountability ratings that charter schools operated by public IHEs may receive for the rating year 2016-2017 and all subsequent rating years are as follows.

(1) P for pass. Beginning with the financial accountability rating for rating year 2016-2017 and all subsequent rating years, in accordance with the procedures established in this section, a charter school operated by a public IHE will receive a P rating if it scores within the applicable range established by the commissioner for a P rating.

(2) F for substandard achievement. Beginning with the financial accountability rating for rating year 2016-2017 and all subsequent rating years, in accordance with the procedures established in this section, a charter school operated by a public IHE will receive an F rating if it scores within the applicable range established by the commissioner for an F rating.

(k) The commissioner may lower a financial accountability rating based on the findings of an action conducted under [the] TEC, Chapter 39 or 39A, or change a financial accountability rating in cases of disaster, flood, extreme weather conditions, fuel curtailment, or another calamity.

(l) A financial accountability rating remains in effect until replaced by a subsequent financial accountability rating.

(m) [The] TEA will issue a preliminary financial accountability rating to a school district, an open-enrollment charter school, or a charter school operated by a public IHE on or before August 8 of each year. [The] TEA will base the financial accountability rating for a rating year on the data from the fiscal year preceding the rating year.

(1) [The] TEA will not delay the issuance of the preliminary or final rating if a school district, an open-enrollment charter school, or a charter school operated by a public IHE fails to meet the statutory deadline under [the] TEC, §44.008, for submitting the AFR. Instead, the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE will receive an F rating for substandard achievement.

(2) If [the] TEA receives an appeal of a preliminary rating, described by subsection (n) of this section, [the] TEA will issue a final rating to the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE no later than 60 days after the deadline for submitting appeals.

(3) If [the] TEA does not receive an appeal of a preliminary rating, described by subsection (n) of this section, the preliminary rating automatically becomes a final rating 31 days after issuance of the preliminary rating.

(n) A school district, an open-enrollment charter school, or a charter school operated by a public IHE may appeal its preliminary financial accountability rating through the following appeals process.

(1) The TEA division responsible for financial accountability must receive a written appeal no later than 30 days after [the] TEA's release of the preliminary rating. The appeal must include adequate evidence and additional information that supports the position of the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE. Appeals received 31 days or more after TEA issues a preliminary rating will not be considered.

(2) A data error attributable to [the] TEA is a basis for an appeal. If a preliminary rating contains a data error attributable to [the] TEA, a school district or an open-enrollment charter school may submit a written appeal requesting a review of the preliminary rating.

(3) A school district, an open-enrollment charter school, or a charter school operated by a public IHE may appeal any other adverse issue it identifies in the preliminary rating.

(4) [The] TEA will only consider appeals that would result in a change of the preliminary rating.

(5) The TEA division responsible for financial accountability will select an external review panel to independently oversee the appeals process.

(6) The TEA division responsible for financial accountability will submit the information provided by the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE to the external review panel members for review.

(7) Each external review panel member will examine the appeal and supporting documentation and will submit his or her recommendation to the TEA division responsible for financial accountability.

(8) The TEA division responsible for financial accountability will compile the recommendations and forward them to the commissioner.

(9) The commissioner will make a final ratings decision.

(A) The commissioner may adjust a score for an indicator or the overall score upon appeal of the indicator(s) by the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE.

(B) Upon appeal of the indicator for the timely submission of a complete AFR, the commissioner may adjust the overall score and rating as described in clauses (i)-(iii) of this subparagraph if the certificate of the board and the audit opinion letter from the external auditor for the school district's or charter school's AFR were signed on or before the due date of the AFR as required in TEC, §44.008.

(i) For a school district or charter school that has a failed preliminary FIRST rating with 85 to 100 points, deduct 15 points from the total points for an overall passing score if no other critical indicators were failed.

(ii) For a school district or charter school that has a failed preliminary FIRST rating with 70 to 84 points, adjust the overall score to 70 points for an overall passing score if no other critical indicators were failed.

(iii) For a school district or charter school that has a failed preliminary FIRST rating with total points less than the threshold for an overall passing score and/or the school district or charter school failed any other critical indicators, no adjustment to the points will be made for the overall score.

(o) A final rating issued by [the] TEA under this section may not be appealed under [the] TEC, §7.057, or any other law or rule.

(p) A financial accountability rating by a voluntary association is a local option of the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE, but it does not substitute for a financial accountability rating by [the] TEA.

(q) Each school district, open-enrollment charter school, and charter school operated by a public IHE is required to report information and financial accountability ratings to parents, taxpayers, and other stakeholders by implementing the following reporting procedures.

(1) Each school district, open-enrollment charter school, and charter school operated by a public IHE must prepare and distribute an annual financial management report in accordance with this subsection.

(2) Each school district, open-enrollment charter school, and charter school operated by a public IHE must provide the public with an opportunity to comment on the report at a public hearing.

(3) The annual financial management report for a school district, an open-enrollment charter school, or a charter school operated by a public IHE must include:

(A) a description of its financial management performance based on a comparison, provided by [the] TEA, of its performance on the indicators established by the commissioner and reflected in this section. The report will contain information that discloses:

(i) state-established standards; and

(ii) the financial management performance of the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE under each indicator for the current and previous year's financial accountability ratings;

(B) any descriptive information required by the commissioner, including:

(i) a copy of the superintendent's current employment contract or other written documentation of employment if no contract exists. This must disclose all compensation and benefits paid to the superintendent. The school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE may publish the superintendent's employment contract on its website instead of publishing it in the annual financial management report;

(ii) a summary schedule for the fiscal year (12-month period) of expenditures paid on behalf of the superintendent and each board member and total reimbursements received by the superintendent and each board member. This includes transactions on the credit card(s), debit card(s), stored-value card(s), and any other similar instrument(s) of the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE to cover expenses incurred by the superintendent and each board member. The summary schedule must separately report reimbursements for meals, lodging, transportation, motor fuel, and other items. The summary schedule of total reimbursements should not include reimbursements for supplies and materials that were purchased for the operation of the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE;

(iii) a summary schedule for the fiscal year of the dollar amount of compensation and fees received by the superintendent from an outside school district, open-enrollment charter school, charter school operated by a public IHE, or any other outside entity in exchange for professional consulting or other personal services. The schedule must separately report the amount received from each entity;

(iv) a summary schedule for the fiscal year of the total dollar amount of gifts that had a total economic value of $250 or more received by the executive officers and board members. This reporting requirement applies only to gifts received by the executive officers and board members (and their immediate family as described by Texas Government Code, Chapter 573, Subchapter B, Relationships by Consanguinity or by Affinity) of the school district, open-enrollment charter school (or charter holder), or charter school operated by a public IHE (or charter holder) from an outside entity that received payments from the school district, open-enrollment charter school (or charter holder), or charter school operated by a public IHE (or charter holder) in the prior fiscal year and to gifts from competing vendors that were not awarded contracts in the prior fiscal year. This reporting requirement does not apply to reimbursement by an outside entity for travel-related expenses when the purpose of the travel was to investigate matters directly related to an executive officer's or board member's duties or to investigate matters related to attendance at education-related conferences and seminars with the primary purpose of providing continuing education (this exclusion does not apply to trips for entertainment purposes or pleasure trips). This reporting requirement excludes an individual gift or a series of gifts from a single outside entity that had a total economic value of less than $250 per executive officer or board member; and

(v) a summary schedule for the fiscal year of the dollar amount received by board members for the total amount of business transactions with the school district, open-enrollment charter school (or charter holder), or charter school operated by a public IHE (or charter holder). This reporting requirement is not to duplicate the items disclosed in the summary schedule of reimbursements received by board members; and

(C) any other information the board of trustees of the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE determines to be useful.

(4) The board of trustees of each school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE must hold a public hearing on the annual financial management report within two months after receiving a final financial accountability rating. The public hearing must be held at a location in the facilities of the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE. The board must give notice of the hearing to owners of real estate property in the geographic boundaries of the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE and to parents of school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE students. In addition to other notice required by law, the board must provide notice of the hearing:

(A) to a newspaper of general circulation in the geographic boundaries of the school district, each campus of an open-enrollment charter school, or each campus of a charter school operated by a public IHE in one posting prior to holding the public meeting, providing the time and place of the hearing. The notice in the newspaper may not be earlier than 30 days or later than 10 days before the date of the hearing. If no newspaper is published in the county in which the district's central administration office is located or within the geographic boundaries of an open-enrollment charter school's campus or campus of a charter school operated by a public IHE, then the board must publish the notice in the county nearest to the county seat of the county in which the district's central administration office is located or in which the campus of the open-enrollment charter school or the campus of a charter school operated by a public IHE is located; and

(B) through electronic mail to the mass communication media serving the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE, including, but not limited to, radio and television.

(5) At the hearing, the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE must provide the annual financial management report to the attending parents and taxpayers.

(6) The school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE must retain the annual financial management report for at least three years after the public hearing and make it available to parents and taxpayers upon request.

(7) Each school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE that received an F rating must file a corrective action plan with [the] TEA, prepared in accordance with instructions from the commissioner, within one month after the public hearing of the school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE. The commissioner may require certain information in the corrective action plan to address the factor(s) that may have contributed to the F rating for a school district, open-enrollment charter school, or charter school operated by a public IHE.

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 16, 2026.

TRD-202601244

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Rulemaking

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 26, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497